Supporting our UTA colleagues at the CRA

Bob Hamilton
Commissioner,
Canada Revenue Agency
555 MacKenzie Avenue, 7th Floor Ottawa ON K1A 0L5
By email: bob.hamilton@canada.ca

February 19, 2021

Dear Mr. Hamilton,

I am writing today regarding the Canada Revenue Agency’s (CRA) recent decision to hire a third-party contractor to answer questions from taxpayers about emergency benefits and their impact on returns in the weeks ahead.

While I agree that various programs introduced to help Canadians during the pandemic may well result in a substantial increase in the number and complexity of questions fielded by the CRA during the upcoming “tax season”, I do not understand why public service professionals have not been asked to perform this work.

Private call centre staff are much likelier to provide incomplete or inaccurate information to taxpayers than CRA personnel. Their training is not of the same calibre and they are not held to the same standard of confidentiality as public service employees. Many Canadians may not realize they are not speaking to a CRA professional and may inadvertently provide confidential information to these private-sector call centre agents. And I don’t have to remind you of the complete fiasco that ensued when hundreds of hastily-prepared call centre agents were hired to provide assistance to federal employees experiencing complex pay problems caused by Phoenix.

The Agency had many options to provide these services internally, including the hiring of Term employees, and I see no good reason why it chose to look to an external provider to do so.

On behalf of the thousands of PIPSC members employed by the CRA, I support the Union of Taxation Employees on this matter and I call upon you to immediately reverse this decision. Canadian taxpayers deserve the best service possible. Contracting out this critical work will once again prove more expensive and less effective than if it were performed by knowledgeable and experienced public service professionals.

Sincerely,

Debi Daviau
President

Published on 1 March 2021

3 November 2017

Phoenix and the status of retroactive pay

We have received several inquiries about the impact of the Phoenix pay system on retroactive pay for members who signed new collective agreements this year.

27 October 2017

Treasury Board agrees to negotiate better birth control coverage for public service employees

After years of advocacy, the Treasury Board has agreed to negotiate the addition of non-oral contraceptives to the Public Service Health Care Plan (PSHCP).

6 October 2017

Words to Live By

Radio-Canada and the CBC have reported this week that Phoenix was “doomed from the start.” The reason? The business case prepared in 2009 under the previous government “lacked proper risk analysis and was politically motivated.” In the words of former parliamentary budget officer Kevin Page, “You look at this business case, you can drive trucks through some of the holes under the risk analysis.”

3 October 2017

PSPC releases latest Pay Bulletin

In light of the Phoenix fiasco and as part of a commitment made to bargaining agents to make it easier for their members to obtain information about their pay, Public Services and Procurement Canada (PSCPC) has just released its Pay Bulletin for September.

2 October 2017

Institute files two new policy grievances over Phoenix

The Institute has just filed two new policy grievances on Phoenix-related issues, accusing the Treasury Board of failing to implement the terms of the AV and SP Group collective agreements within the specified timeframe (120 and 90 days respectively).

29 September 2017

The Phoenix Pay System’s Not-So-Golden Handshake

While much has been reported about the impact of the Phoenix pay system on current federal employees, comparatively little has been said about the harm done to retirees.